Automated vs Manual
Stop manually checking client websites.
You open each client site. You check if the pixel is there. You look at the consent banner. You scan for anything unusual. Then you do it again next week. There is a better way.
Manual Checking
Tracefox
Time per week
2-5 hours
0 hours (automated)
Sites you can cover
5-10 realistically
Up to 75+
Detection accuracy
Easy to miss subtle changes
Every script, cookie, and banner tracked
Response time
Days to weeks
Same-day alerts
Historical record
None (unless you screenshot)
Full scan history with timestamps
Client reports
Create manually in Docs/Slides
Auto-generated branded PDFs
Scales with growth
Gets worse as you add clients
Handles more sites with zero extra work
Works on weekends
Only if you do
Runs 24/7 automatically
The real cost of manual monitoring
Your time
2-5 hours per week manually checking sites. That is 100-250 hours per year you could spend on billable work.
Missed changes
You cannot catch what you do not see. A removed pixel, a modified cookie, a broken banner, all invisible during a quick visual check.
No proof
When a client asks 'were you monitoring our site?', you have no evidence. No timestamps, no reports, no audit trail.
What changes when you automate
Agencies that switch to Tracefox get their time back and catch more issues.
Every client site scanned daily, automatically
Alerts delivered to your inbox and Slack
Changes categorized by type and severity
Branded PDF reports generated on demand
Full change history as your audit trail
No code, no access, no setup on client sites
Reclaim your hours. Catch more issues.
Stop spending time on manual checks. Let Tracefox handle it.
Start Free Trial7-day free trial. No credit card required.