Automated vs Manual

Stop manually checking client websites.

You open each client site. You check if the pixel is there. You look at the consent banner. You scan for anything unusual. Then you do it again next week. There is a better way.

Manual Checking
Tracefox
Time per week
2 to 5 hours
Only the time to review alerts
Sites you can cover
5 to 10 realistically
Up to 50 (5, 15 or 50 by plan)
Detection accuracy
Easy to miss subtle changes
Every script, cookie, and banner tracked
Response time
Days to weeks
Alert after each weekly or daily scan
Historical record
None (unless you screenshot)
Full scan history with timestamps
Client reports
Create manually in Docs/Slides
Auto-generated PDFs (white-label on Pro and Business)
Scales with growth
Gets worse as you add clients
Handles more sites with zero extra work
Works on weekends
Only if you do
Runs on schedule, weekends included

Manual checks can still be the better fit if you look after one or two sites that rarely change.

The real cost of manual monitoring

Your time

Checking every client site by hand takes time each week, and the time grows with every site you add. That time could go to billable work.

Missed changes

You cannot catch what you do not see. A removed pixel, a modified cookie, a broken banner, all invisible during a quick visual check.

No proof

When a client asks 'were you monitoring our site?', you have no evidence. No timestamps, no reports, no audit trail.

What changes when you automate

Agencies that switch to Tracefox get their time back and catch more issues.

Every client site scanned automatically, weekly or daily by plan
Alerts by email, and in Slack on Pro and Business
Changes categorized by type and severity
PDF client reports on demand, white-label on Pro and Business
Full change history as your audit trail
No code, no access, no setup on client sites

Reclaim your hours. Catch more issues.

Stop spending time on manual checks. Let Tracefox handle it.

Start free
Free plan available. No credit card required.